Slow Acclimation vs Quick-Release
Fish Acclimation
We’ve recently had a couple inquiries on why our acclimation procedures are so different
from others they’ve seen. A person said that in one instance they were instructed to
just open the bag and pour the fish directly into the tank, with no acclimation and
the fish did great. They also said that ones they brought home from a pet shop and
acclimated slowly, died shortly after. They couldn’t understand how Angels Plus’
procedure could be considered better in light of their experience. This seems like
a good time to delve into this subject.
First, when a fish dies, we really have no good way of determining exactly why it died.
Was it diseased? Did it experience some other trauma that contributed to its condition?
Was there a substance in the new water that was toxic or some other hidden stress factor?
Was it acclimated too fast, too slow, or maybe a combination of any or all of the above?
The fact that it died should not automatically lead us to the conclusion that it was the
slow acclimation.
Many fish keepers tend to measure things, like pH, ammonia, nitrite and nitrate.
If those are fine, some will claim the water is perfect. Yet, we fail to realize that
water is a universal solvent. Almost everything will dissolve in it and the number of
possible toxins that could be measured (if we had the ability) is almost endless. Some
of these things a fish may handle if slowly acclimated to them. Others may be deadly if
presented in full force all at once. Also, what a fish can handle when not under stress
is usually quite different from what it can take when other stress factors have affected
it for a long trip to their new environment. To analyze a problem when dealing with an
infinitely complex set of variables, scientists are often forced to resort to “outcome
driven” information analysis. In other words, outcome driven studies start with events
known to occur and then look for the scientific explanations of how and why it occurred.
In this instance, we don’t go so far as to try and figure out exactly why it occurs,
just that it does and what method is best to overcome the negative outcome.
Having shipped well over 100,000 bags of fish to many climates and far-away places,
we have a good collection of data to examine. For years, we always contacted customers
after shipments and took a short survey on the results and the exact steps they took
getting the fish into their tanks. Our experience tells us that the results aren't even
close. Angelfish shipped by us that were slowly acclimated have far higher survival
rates than those that were plopped into a tank. This does not mean that other methods
don’t work, they obviously do – at least in the right situation and may even be the
best method in those situations, but how does one know in advance what the new environment
is going to present to the fish? We’ve found that we cannot predict how another person’s
situation might affect a fish sent from our water to theirs. We’ve found it’s best to go
slow if you don’t know. Of course, a person can always risk one fish on the quick method
and observe its reaction carefully for 30 minutes. That will teach them a lot, but it
will put the fish at potential risk.
So, have we proven why slow acclimation works? No, just that it is the safest method for
our customers receiving our fish, based on our customer's experiences.
© 2010 Angels Plus